<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Singapore Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.singaporelawreview.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whistleblowers – To Protect or Not? by Navaratnam V</title>
		<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2010/12/whistleblowers-%e2%80%93-to-protect-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-61986</link>
		<dc:creator>Navaratnam V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singaporelawreview.org/?p=1096#comment-61986</guid>
		<description>Eugene: Thank you. A useful article on an important issue. I hope the Government will act fast on providing protection and encouragement to whistleblowers.There may be several frauds, simlar to the one at SLA, remaining undetected. It is foolish to rely on external audit. Auditors are not trained to dectect fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugene: Thank you. A useful article on an important issue. I hope the Government will act fast on providing protection and encouragement to whistleblowers.There may be several frauds, simlar to the one at SLA, remaining undetected. It is foolish to rely on external audit. Auditors are not trained to dectect fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Father&#8217;s Sins by Tots</title>
		<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2010/03/a-fathers-sins/comment-page-1/#comment-61682</link>
		<dc:creator>Tots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singaporelawreview.org/?p=944#comment-61682</guid>
		<description>After reading, there are rooms of thoughts. If today the father bears a illegitimate child with the mistress. Then choose to divorce the legal wife and married the mistress. Then the illegitimate child will become legal ? In this case, should I say it will be the father&#039;s duty to decide if to provide the status required to get the rightful claims he would Like to give to his child in the first place? Does that makes the legal wife and children from the first marriage any better in any case ? Or via versa .. ? Having the law written this way .. How much it will help from the fact which has Been done ? And how much it helps to cut down divorce rate ? Was it really necessary to differ the status of the child who is innocent in the first place ? So law was pass to make the necessary actions required to undo the status ,was it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading, there are rooms of thoughts. If today the father bears a illegitimate child with the mistress. Then choose to divorce the legal wife and married the mistress. Then the illegitimate child will become legal ? In this case, should I say it will be the father&#8217;s duty to decide if to provide the status required to get the rightful claims he would Like to give to his child in the first place? Does that makes the legal wife and children from the first marriage any better in any case ? Or via versa .. ? Having the law written this way .. How much it will help from the fact which has Been done ? And how much it helps to cut down divorce rate ? Was it really necessary to differ the status of the child who is innocent in the first place ? So law was pass to make the necessary actions required to undo the status ,was it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paparazzi v. Privacy by matt</title>
		<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2010/08/paparazzi-v-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-56638</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singaporelawreview.org/?p=1005#comment-56638</guid>
		<description>Are there any laws protecting the rights of Singapore citizens from the Photographic exploits of the likes of the &quot;stomp&quot; section in the Starits times. Time and time again i see ridicule and abuse from a non consenting photo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any laws protecting the rights of Singapore citizens from the Photographic exploits of the likes of the &#8220;stomp&#8221; section in the Starits times. Time and time again i see ridicule and abuse from a non consenting photo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Drawing the Lines in the Playground of Creativity: The Legality of Fanfictions and Fanworks by SLR&#8217;s Juris Illuminae Monthly Newsletter &#171; justified:nuslaw</title>
		<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2011/10/drawing-the-lines-in-the-playground-of-creativity-the-legality-of-fanfictions-and-fanworks/comment-page-1/#comment-55787</link>
		<dc:creator>SLR&#8217;s Juris Illuminae Monthly Newsletter &#171; justified:nuslaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singaporelawreview.org/?p=1245#comment-55787</guid>
		<description>[...] Drawing the Lines in the Playground of Creativity: The Legality of Fanfictions and FanWorks - By Intan Wirayadi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drawing the Lines in the Playground of Creativity: The Legality of Fanfictions and FanWorks &#8211; By Intan Wirayadi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Of Money and Politics: The Political Donations Act by Juris Illuminae Monthly Newsletter &#171; justified:nuslaw</title>
		<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2011/10/of-money-and-politics-the-political-donations-act/comment-page-1/#comment-55786</link>
		<dc:creator>Juris Illuminae Monthly Newsletter &#171; justified:nuslaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singaporelawreview.org/?p=1238#comment-55786</guid>
		<description>[...] Of Money and Politics: The Political Donations Act – By Eugene Lee  We hope you enjoy reading the issue as much as we have enjoyed writing it, and welcome your comments and support. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of Money and Politics: The Political Donations Act – By Eugene Lee  We hope you enjoy reading the issue as much as we have enjoyed writing it, and welcome your comments and support. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

