http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/12/spandeck-the-donoghue-v-stevenson-of-singapore/ Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:38:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/12/spandeck-the-donoghue-v-stevenson-of-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-28874 Eugene Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:50:16 +0000 http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/12/spandeck-the-donoghue-v-stevenson-of-singapore/#comment-28874 Yeah. What Robert said. Yeah. What Robert said.

]]> http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/12/spandeck-the-donoghue-v-stevenson-of-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-27356 Robert Matthews Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:24:53 +0000 http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/12/spandeck-the-donoghue-v-stevenson-of-singapore/#comment-27356 You've got a number of facts wrong and the background history muddled up. The test of reasonable foreseeability comes from Donoghue. Proximity was established in Anns, long before Caparo. You’ve got a number of facts wrong and the background history muddled up. The test of reasonable foreseeability comes from Donoghue. Proximity was established in Anns, long before Caparo.

]]>