<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decriminalising Homosexual Acts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/02/decriminalising-homosexual-acts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/02/decriminalising-homosexual-acts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Su Mengde</title>
		<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/02/decriminalising-homosexual-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-8351</link>
		<dc:creator>Su Mengde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/02/decriminalising-homosexual-acts/#comment-8351</guid>
		<description>Intuitive disgust implies that people would be against the change of law regarding sodomy. 

The last thing we want are sentiments against the legisation and offending our still-strong conservative base.

It would appear that law making would still have to appeal to the public&#039;s view on sodomy, logical or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intuitive disgust implies that people would be against the change of law regarding sodomy. </p>
<p>The last thing we want are sentiments against the legisation and offending our still-strong conservative base.</p>
<p>It would appear that law making would still have to appeal to the public&#8217;s view on sodomy, logical or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/02/decriminalising-homosexual-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-2330</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 01:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/02/decriminalising-homosexual-acts/#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>Strong arguments - good work.

Aidil should have just laid bare his arguments - which really amount to saying that because Islam bans homosexuality, Singapore should follow suit. It doesn&#039;t matter that the rest are non muslims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strong arguments &#8211; good work.</p>
<p>Aidil should have just laid bare his arguments &#8211; which really amount to saying that because Islam bans homosexuality, Singapore should follow suit. It doesn&#8217;t matter that the rest are non muslims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Lek</title>
		<link>http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/02/decriminalising-homosexual-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Lek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2007/02/decriminalising-homosexual-acts/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>A pretty well-written rebuttal, which incorporated sensible arguments. Cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pretty well-written rebuttal, which incorporated sensible arguments. Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

